Skip to content
FacebookTwitterYouTube
ASAPbio
Accelerating Science and Publication in Biology
ASAPbio
  • Blog
    • ASAPbio newsUpdates and announcements from ASAPbio
    • Guest posts
    • Peer reviewThese commentaries were collected in advance of the Transparency, Recognition, and Innovation in Peer Review in the Life Sciences meeting
    • Preprint commentaryAhead of the 2016 preprint meeting, we encouraged readers to submit “white papers” describing their position on one or more topics relating to preprints.
    • News from around the web
  • Peer Review
    • Peer Review Meeting
      • Attendees
      • Agenda
      • Vote on transparency & recognition
      • Peer review meeting summary
    • Peer review survey results
    • Peer Review Commentary
  • Preprints
    • Preprint info center
      • Preprint FAQ
      • Journal policies & practices
      • Funder policies
      • University policies
      • Biology preprints over time
      • Preprint stories
    • Take action to support preprints
    • ASAPbio ambassadors
    • Request stickers
    • Preprint journal clubs
  • Meetings
    • Preprint Meeting (2016)
      • Commentary for 2016 meeting
      • Survey results
      • Draft document results
      • Meeting objectives
      • Program
      • Attendees (2016 preprint meeting)
      • Videos: talks and discussions
      • Preprint Resources
        • Preprint reading
        • Different models in science communication
    • Funders’ Workshop (2016)
    • Technical Workshop (2016)
      • Agenda
      • Background
      • Attendees
    • Scientific Society Preprint Town Hall (2017)
    • Evolving Preprint Ecosystem (2017)
    • Peer Review (2018)
  • About us
Search
  • Blog
    • ASAPbio newsUpdates and announcements from ASAPbio
    • Guest posts
    • Peer reviewThese commentaries were collected in advance of the Transparency, Recognition, and Innovation in Peer Review in the Life Sciences meeting
    • Preprint commentaryAhead of the 2016 preprint meeting, we encouraged readers to submit “white papers” describing their position on one or more topics relating to preprints.
    • News from around the web
  • Peer Review
    • Peer Review Meeting
      • Attendees
      • Agenda
      • Vote on transparency & recognition
      • Peer review meeting summary
    • Peer review survey results
    • Peer Review Commentary
  • Preprints
    • Preprint info center
      • Preprint FAQ
      • Journal policies & practices
      • Funder policies
      • University policies
      • Biology preprints over time
      • Preprint stories
    • Take action to support preprints
    • ASAPbio ambassadors
    • Request stickers
    • Preprint journal clubs
  • Meetings
    • Preprint Meeting (2016)
      • Commentary for 2016 meeting
      • Survey results
      • Draft document results
      • Meeting objectives
      • Program
      • Attendees (2016 preprint meeting)
      • Videos: talks and discussions
      • Preprint Resources
        • Preprint reading
        • Different models in science communication
    • Funders’ Workshop (2016)
    • Technical Workshop (2016)
      • Agenda
      • Background
      • Attendees
    • Scientific Society Preprint Town Hall (2017)
    • Evolving Preprint Ecosystem (2017)
    • Peer Review (2018)
  • About us

Monthly Archives: March 2018

You are here:
  1. Home
  2. 2018
  3. March

Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles – a crowdsourced initiative

Blog, Guest postsBy Jessica Polka2018-03-30

By Olavo B. Amaral Institute of Medical Biochemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil As the preprint movement gains traction in biology, the time is ripe to revisit some aspects of scientific publication that we view as fundamental – first and foremost of which is the peer review process itself. Common concerns about preprints…

Creative Commons License
This work by ASAPbio is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Go to Top