Skip to navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to footer

Welcome to the new ASAPbio website! See what’s on the roadmap for 2025.

New to preprints and open peer review? Explore our resource library.

Get Involved

Private vote on peer review transparency & recognition

Peer Review (2018)

For more information, go to the main event page.

Pie chart showing participant distribution: 28.8% remote and 71.2% onsite. Total 118 unique participants. Remote section is red; onsite section is grey.
A pie chart showing opinions on whether life science journals should adopt open referee reports. Agree: 81.4% in red, Disagree: 9.3% in black, Not sure: 9.3% in white.
Pie chart showing opinions on assigning DOIs to referee reports. 79.7% agree, 11.0% are not sure, and 9.3% disagree.
A pie chart shows opinions on linking DOIs of peer review reports to work on platforms like PubMed: 80.5% agree, 10.2% not sure, and 9.3% disagree.
Pie chart showing opinions on whether journals should give reviewers the option to publish their names: 74.6% agree, 11.9% disagree, and 13.6% are not sure.
Pie chart showing opinions on recognizing scientists for peer review contributions. Red section for Agree is 85.6%, white for Not sure is 12.7%, and black for Disagree is 1.7%. Title suggests the recognition is by funding agencies.
Pie chart on ethical disclosure of peer review contributors: 88.1% agree, 7.6% not sure, and 4.2% disagree.

Anonymized results, assigned remote/onsite (one duplicate response removed): Download .xlsx

Subscribe to the ASAPbio newsletter

Receive the latest news about ASAPbio, preprints, and open peer review every 1-2 months. Your email will not be shared. Review our privacy policy.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.