Welcome to the new ASAPbio website! See what’s on the roadmap for 2025.
Getting started with reviewing preprints!
There are many ways to review a preprint. Click to jump down and learn more:


Benefits: The review can be multi-format from limited comments to a full traditional-style review. The comments are linked to individual versions.
Using Zenodo
Preprint server(s): any
Steps to leaving a review on Zenodo:
- Write your review in a word processor of your choice
- Sign up to Zenodo
- Upload your review
Learn more at zenodo.org.


Benefits: Reviews get DOI’s and can be added to CVs.
Using PREreview
Preprint server(s): any
Steps to leaving a review on Zenodo:
- Sign up for a PREreview account
- Copy the DOI of your chosen preprint
- Click “Review a preprint” and follow the steps
- Add the review co-authors and submit your review
Learn more at prereview.org.


Benefits: Receive ORCiD recognition for the review. The review appears alongside the preprint (for bioRxiv).
Using hypothes.is
Preprint server(s): any
Hypothes.is allows you to provide public or private in-line comments on preprints.
Steps to leaving a review on hypothes.is:
- Sign up for an account and install the bookmarklet or Chrome extension
- Navigate to the preprint and open the extension to begin leaving public comments
(highlight the text you’d like to annotate) - If possible, summarise the annotations in a comment on the preprint too
Learn more at: 10.5281/zenodo.10245909 and https://web.hypothes.is/help/annotation-basics/


Benefits: Leave in-line comments on specific elements in a preprint without the need to comment on the full article. A good approach for an in-person journal club.

Use any of the methods mentioned as part of your normal journal club
Preprint server(s): any
- If members bring laptops, you can comment together using hypothes.is and then summarise those annotations as a comment on the preprint server. Or note comments during the journal club and then summarise these in a comment on the preprint.
- This helps reduce wasted time and effort from normal journal clubs where reviewing activities occur but are not normally shared with authors.
- Plus, by reviewing as a crowd, individuals can comment on their area of expertise and collaboratively review a preprint.

Benefits: Actively learn the process of review and produce a useful output of journal clubs. Interact with authors and build the profiles of journal club members.