In late January, ASAPbio, in collaboration with EMBL-EBI and Ithaka S+R, hosted the #bioPreprints2020 workshop to improve the discoverability, reuse, and interoperability of preprints in the life and biomedical sciences. After the meeting, attendees formed working groups to establish draft recommendations for preprint metadata, withdrawal and removal definitions, data availability statements, versioning, and surfacing review events in the context of preprints.
The following is a summary of major recommendations from the report.
Preprint servers
Create a permanent identifier (PID) for each preprint version; link all versions together.
Allow authors to indicate data availability (and provide links to data deposited elsewhere) when submitting a preprint, make this information discoverable by humans and machines, and transfer this information to journals as part of preprint-to-journal transfer workflows.
Adopt standardized definitions of withdrawal (original preprint full text remains) and removal (original preprint full text removed). Clearly display withdrawal and removal notices and notify journals if a preprint has been withdrawn or removed after journal publication.
Create recommended metadata (see table 2 in report for details).
Summary of recommended metadata
Essential
Desired
Optional
Article identifier Posted date Repository name Article title Author names Withdrawal status File modification status IsVersionOf License
Repository owner Abstract Author affiliation(s) Version ID
Author roles Submitter Affiliation ID(s) Author ID (s) Funder ID Grant ID Journal version Withdrawal/removal reason References Article type Language Keywords and terms Changelog Available resource statement Available resource type Available resource links COI statement Quality control information Discipline
Peer review services
Create and manage metadata for review events; make this available to preprint servers and others.
Journals
When transferring a journal submission to a preprint server, transfer data availability statements to the server and work toward interoperability of data availability statements.
Notify preprint servers in the case of article withdrawal/removals, for example via Crossref Crossmark.
Thanks
This would not have been possible without the input and energy of the meeting attendees and representatives of additional preprint services who provided feedback on the recommendations. We thank all those involved in developing this resource. See a complete list in the acknowledgements section on page 26 of the report.
Your feedback welcome
We welcome feedback from readers, which we hope to integrate in a future revision of the report. Leave us a comment on the preprint or feel free to email [email protected].
Featured image: a suggestion for a new sticker design from the swag table at #bioPreprints2020.
In late January, ASAPbio, in collaboration with EMBL-EBI and Ithaka S+R, hosted the #bioPreprints2020 workshop to improve the discoverability, reuse, and interoperability of preprints in the life and biomedical sciences. After the meeting, attendees formed working groups to establish draft recommendations for preprint metadata, withdrawal and removal definitions, data availability statements, versioning, and surfacing review events in the context of preprints.
Today marks the release of the meeting report, “Building trust in preprints: recommendations for servers and other stakeholders.”
Best practice recommendations
The following is a summary of major recommendations from the report.
Preprint servers
Summary of recommended metadata
Posted date
Repository name
Article title
Author names
Withdrawal status
File modification status
IsVersionOf
License
Abstract
Author affiliation(s)
Version ID
Submitter
Affiliation ID(s)
Author ID (s)
Funder ID
Grant ID
Journal version
Withdrawal/removal reason
References
Article type
Language
Keywords and terms
Changelog
Available resource statement
Available resource type
Available resource links
COI statement
Quality control information
Discipline
Peer review services
Journals
Thanks
This would not have been possible without the input and energy of the meeting attendees and representatives of additional preprint services who provided feedback on the recommendations. We thank all those involved in developing this resource. See a complete list in the acknowledgements section on page 26 of the report.
Your feedback welcome
We welcome feedback from readers, which we hope to integrate in a future revision of the report. Leave us a comment on the preprint or feel free to email [email protected].
Featured image: a suggestion for a new sticker design from the swag table at #bioPreprints2020.